Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 62% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 64% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	64.1% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190702
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 03 '19 at 18:32
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	CHL-User
Background CPU	12%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (78^th percentile)	90.3% Outstanding	Memory 71 1-Core 150 2-Core 298 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 586 8-Core 1,098 100% 842 Pts	64-Core 1,410 87% 1,410 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 90.3% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 3775) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.15 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.1% Good	Lighting 80.9 Reflection 81.4 Parallax 77.2 66% 79.8 fps	MRender 70 Gravity 74.5 Splatting 75.9 60% 73.5 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 64.1% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 156GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM06B0Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 6,567 Write 6,383 Mixed 6,281 1,433% 6,410 MB/s	4K Read 540 4K Write 217 4K Mixed 272 1,281% 343 MB/s	DQ Read 1,552 DQ Write 1,118 DQ Mixed 1,176 921% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 199GB free Firmware: DXM06B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 443 445 447 445 445 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 447 Mixed 355 SusWrite 445 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 33.7 4K Write 89 4K Mixed 43.1 153% 55.3 MB/s	DQ Read 220 DQ Write 186 DQ Mixed 133 119% 180 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 116%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 439GB free Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 2330 837 840 843 844 843 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	332% Outstanding	Read 2,650 Write 2,610 Mixed 1,948 SusWrite 1,090 465% 2,075 MB/s	4K Read 70.4 4K Write 187 4K Mixed 99.6 333% 119 MB/s	DQ Read 1,325 DQ Write 1,197 DQ Mixed 1,264 947% 1,262 MB/s
Poor: 178% ↑ This bench: 332% Great: 355%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33 1,562,409 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 30GB free Firmware: CC46 SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 102 101 100 102 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	56.5% Above average	Read 95.5 Write 67.7 Mixed 70 SusWrite 101 62% 83.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 167% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 55% ↑ This bench: 56.5% Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79 179,101 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 175 177 172 169 177 MB/s Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	81.6% Excellent	Read 112 Write 135 Mixed 72.2 SusWrite 172 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 63% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 81.6% Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 116GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 131 134 134 132 131 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 93 Write 72.5 Mixed 68 SusWrite 132 67% 91.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 40GB free Firmware: CC29 SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 84 85 84 84 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	48.4% Average	Read 84.2 Write 43.5 Mixed 62.7 SusWrite 84.2 51% 68.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 144% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 48.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 5,804 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (15^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	68.5% Good	MC Read 28.1 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 27 70% 24.4 GB/s	SC Read 21.6 SC Write 18.1 SC Mixed 26.9 63% 22.2 GB/s	Latency 99.1 40% 99.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,824 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $150Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	868x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $200Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	570x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	271x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $933

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16