ADD TO PC
BUILD

Lenovo 3626M49

Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	0.61% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	19.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

System	Lenovo 3626M49 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO 3626M49
Memory	1.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120426
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 04 '19 at 10:22
Run Duration	182 Seconds
Run User	TWN-User
Background CPU	10%

PC Performing as expected (44^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5 M 560-$65 10,722 User benchmarks, average bench 41% None, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.65 GHz Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	44.4% Average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 31.5 2-Core 73.2 37% 56.4 Pts	4-Core 138 8-Core 173 20% 156 Pts	64-Core 173 11% 173 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 48%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (Arrandale 0.667/0.766 GHz) 99,513 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 215A) 1.8GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2555 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	0.61% Terrible	Lighting 0.67 Reflection 0.92 Parallax 0.66 0% 0.75 fps	MRender 0.71 Gravity 0.47 Splatting 1.3 1% 0.83 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.61% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 67GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 64 14 72 69 12 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	19.3% Very poor	Read 124 Write 59 Mixed 93.2 SusWrite 54 18% 82.7 MB/s	4K Read 11.8 4K Write 9.4 4K Mixed 6.5 31% 9.23 MB/s	DQ Read 70.9 DQ Write 9.6 DQ Mixed 15.2 18% 31.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 19.3% Great: 85%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 500GB 4,068 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 344GB free, PID a006 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 13 15 MB/s Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 29 Write 21.3 SusWrite 13.7 25% 21.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 6% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 43%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 14,232 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 781GB free, PID a202 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 14 13 14 13 13 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	12.2% Very poor	Read 28.8 Write 21.3 Mixed 18.5 SusWrite 13.7 26% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 80% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.2% Great: 49%
Sony Storage Media 16GB 832 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 13GB free, PID 02a5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.5 5.6 5.2 5.6 5.6 5.2 MB/s Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	5.12% Terrible	Read 21.8 Write 0.8 Mixed 5.3 SusWrite 5.3 8% 8.3 MB/s	4K Read 3.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 13% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.12% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown M471B5673FH0-CF8 80CE M471B5673FH0-CH9 4GB 26 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1066, 1334 MHz 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	24% Poor	MC Read 7.7 MC Write 6.8 MC Mixed 10.3 24% 8.27 GB/s	SC Read 6.3 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 6.4 17% 5.87 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 40%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback