Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 56% Gunboat	Desktop 99% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	49.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO
Motherboard	Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO (all builds)
Memory	29 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190605
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 05 '19 at 20:13
Run Duration	211 Seconds
Run User	ESP-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	99.4% Outstanding	Memory 95.9 1-Core 142 2-Core 286 97% 175 Pts	4-Core 551 8-Core 1,119 98% 835 Pts	64-Core 1119 69% 1119 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 99.4% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200 834,238 User benchmarks, average bench 49% Gigabyte(1458 367B) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	49.6% Average	Lighting 71.3 Reflection 70.5 Parallax 63.4 58% 68.4 fps	MRender 73.2 Gravity 65.9 Splatting 0.09 33% 46.4 fps
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 54%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB 44,528 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 818GB free (System drive) Firmware: UH5100RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 88 57 25 53 87 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 448 Write 255 Mixed 209 SusWrite 67.1 54% 245 MB/s	4K Read 17.5 4K Write 40 4K Mixed 10.2 61% 22.6 MB/s	DQ Read 116 DQ Write 62.1 DQ Mixed 16.4 32% 64.7 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 58%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 99GB free Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 369 269 256 262 264 258 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 502 Write 463 Mixed 411 SusWrite 280 93% 414 MB/s	4K Read 40.9 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 49.8 171% 58.9 MB/s	DQ Read 378 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 230 208% 315 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 466GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 480 484 489 489 491 485 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	122% Outstanding	Read 497 Write 475 Mixed 400 SusWrite 486 105% 464 MB/s	4K Read 41 4K Write 92 4K Mixed 53.8 180% 62.3 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 340 DQ Mixed 354 267% 357 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 122% Great: 134%
Corsair Force 120GB 1,958 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 112GB free Firmware: 2.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 67 68 64 65 68 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	50.6% Above average	Read 168 Write 109 Mixed 142 SusWrite 67.3 27% 121 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 70.9 4K Mixed 29.4 111% 41.4 MB/s	DQ Read 143 DQ Write 107 DQ Mixed 83.5 74% 111 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 50.6% Great: 56%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 432GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 62 62 63 64 63 62 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	36.7% Below average	Read 65 Write 60.7 Mixed 39.8 SusWrite 62.8 42% 57.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.4 100% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.7% Great: 59%
WD WD5002AALX-00J37A0 500GB 10,663 User benchmarks, average bench 56% 466GB free Firmware: 15.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 22 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	16% Very poor	Read 33.5 Write 40.7 Mixed 34 SusWrite 21.6 24% 32.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 16% Great: 72%
Seagate Expansion Desk 3TB 13,194 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0711 SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	15.8% Very poor	Read 33.3 Write 34.5 Mixed 28.3 SusWrite 21.4 22% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 15.8% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 2x16GB 2,976 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	93.2% Outstanding	MC Read 34.6 MC Write 35.1 MC Mixed 28.7 94% 32.8 GB/s	SC Read 21.2 SC Write 37.9 SC Mixed 27.4 82% 28.8 GB/s	Latency 54.3 74% 54.3 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 93.2% Great: 101%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z390 AORUS PRO-CF Builds (Compare 8,481 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 114%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 105%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z390 AORUS PRO - $194

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	2,617x
Core i9-9900KIntel $410Bench 98%, 354,223 samples	2,478x
Core i5-9600KIntel $155Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	1,143x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	683x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	579x
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	481x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $90Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	586x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	418x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	382x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	315x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	285x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $80Bench 88%, 110,884 samples	246x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 118% - Outstanding

Total price: $791

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16