Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 72% Battleship	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 65% Battle cruiser


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	79.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	15.4% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181029
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Oct 14 '19 at 13:55
Run Duration	150 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	24%

Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$120 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	83.4% Excellent	Memory 81.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 244 83% 150 Pts	4-Core 459 8-Core 697 72% 578 Pts	64-Core 932 58% 932 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 83.4% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$324 645,160 User benchmarks, average bench 90% Asus(1043 868E) CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.48 Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	79.3% Very good	Lighting 102 Reflection 95.7 Parallax 91.4 83% 96.5 fps	MRender 116 Gravity 82.4 Splatting 71.3 71% 89.8 fps
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 79.3% Great: 97%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Jamesdonrey JD240 240GB 165 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 114GB free (System drive) Firmware: JD2018 SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 7.7 7.5 121 3.9 14 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	15.4% Very poor	Read 6.5 Write 1.5 Mixed 4.5 SusWrite 71 5% 20.9 MB/s	4K Read 3.1 4K Write 65.4 4K Mixed 0.1 39% 22.9 MB/s	DQ Read 4.9 DQ Write 1.9 DQ Mixed 0.2 1% 2.33 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 15.4% Great: 83%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 183GB free Firmware: RVT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 447 376 379 378 377 378 MB/s Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 480 Mixed 422 SusWrite 389 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 39.7 4K Write 86.5 4K Mixed 53.5 174% 59.9 MB/s	DQ Read 386 DQ Write 359 DQ Mixed 368 277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 129%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 725GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 119 120 121 120 121 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	87.8% Excellent	Read 186 Write 172 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 120 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.3 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 236% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 87.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D30CESTK.8FD 2x8GB 3,847 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	MC Read 39.8 MC Write 33.1 MC Mixed 32.2 100% 35 GB/s	SC Read 24.5 SC Write 35.2 SC Mixed 27.8 83% 29.2 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,015 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 78%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus TUF B450M-PLUS GAMING

CPU
Ryzen 5 3600AMD $84Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples	836x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	627x
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	291x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	295x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	237x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	226x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	101x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	90x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	72x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	179x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	134x
HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 239,203 samples	126x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 81% - Excellent

Total price: $476

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16