Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 91% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 89% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 92% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	107% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING
Motherboard	Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING (all builds)
Memory	10.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190108
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Oct 18 '19 at 21:05
Run Duration	356 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

Watch Gameplay: 5700-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$225 66,470 User benchmarks, average bench 71% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	79.6% Very good	Memory 79.5 1-Core 118 2-Core 233 80% 143 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 823 74% 625 Pts	64-Core 1,278 79% 1,278 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 79.6% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 5700-XT-$199 254,908 User benchmarks, average bench 98% AMD(1002 0B36) Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	107% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 114 Parallax 239 108% 162 fps	MRender 112 Gravity 126 Splatting 156 110% 131 fps
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 107% Great: 104%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$82 74,184 User benchmarks, average bench 242% 399GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0118C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 998 460 550 524 529 816 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	200% Outstanding	Read 2,081 Write 1,070 Mixed 639 SusWrite 646 244% 1,109 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 47 169% 63.6 MB/s	DQ Read 574 DQ Write 538 DQ Mixed 579 428% 564 MB/s
Poor: 147% ↑ This bench: 200% Great: 311%
PNY SSD2SC480G1CS1754D117-514 480GB 2,428 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 447GB free Firmware: CS111101 SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 386 406 381 375 359 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	91.6% Outstanding	Read 387 Write 402 Mixed 275 SusWrite 382 82% 362 MB/s	4K Read 25.5 4K Write 80.5 4K Mixed 37.1 129% 47.7 MB/s	DQ Read 275 DQ Write 301 DQ Mixed 191 170% 256 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 91.6% Great: 99%
Intel 535 Series 480GB-$180 3,042 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 447GB free Firmware: RG21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 250 265 273 260 228 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Read 436 Write 286 Mixed 360 SusWrite 258 75% 335 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 20 4K Mixed 26.5 90% 25.5 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 99.9 DQ Mixed 115 98% 148 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 69%
Samsung 950 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$625 54,978 User benchmarks, average bench 223% 114GB free Firmware: 2B0QBXX7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 947 932 833 801 782 803 MB/s Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	192% Outstanding	Read 1268 Write 983 Mixed 798 SusWrite 850 218% 975 MB/s	4K Read 44.7 4K Write 103 4K Mixed 55.7 194% 67.9 MB/s	DQ Read 900 DQ Write 410 DQ Mixed 502 413% 604 MB/s
Poor: 138% ↑ This bench: 192% Great: 283%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 324GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1844 880 594 573 617 615 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	270% Outstanding	Read 2,554 Write 1,886 Mixed 1,557 SusWrite 854 381% 1,713 MB/s	4K Read 60.4 4K Write 118 4K Mixed 77.2 253% 85.2 MB/s	DQ Read 932 DQ Write 723 DQ Mixed 870 639% 842 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 270% Great: 340%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 145 152 143 141 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Read 165 Write 151 Mixed 85.5 SusWrite 144 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 88%
WD Red 3TB (2012)-$50 68,726 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 134 142 133 130 126 MB/s Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	77.6% Very good	Read 137 Write 141 Mixed 88.8 SusWrite 134 92% 125 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1 188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 77.6% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FD BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FD BLT4G4D30AETA.K8FE 16GB 20 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 3066, 3066, 3066, 3066 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	104% Outstanding	MC Read 40.5 MC Write 38.2 MC Mixed 35.3 109% 38 GB/s	SC Read 24.2 SC Write 38.5 SC Mixed 28.1 86% 30.3 GB/s	Latency 81.5 49% 81.5 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 104% Great: 109%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING-CF Builds (Compare 4,627 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 80%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte X470 AORUS ULTRA GAMING - $140

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	1,405x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $155Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	540x
Ryzen 5 2600XAMD $120Bench 74%, 142,983 samples	533x

GPU
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	318x
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	227x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	207x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	174x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	171x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	135x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	245x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	183x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	156x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 95% - Outstanding

Total price: $673

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16