Asus B75M-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 19% Surfboard	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	17.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	74.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

Motherboard	Asus B75M-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20140707
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Oct 26 '19 at 14:15
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	83.8% Excellent	Memory 94.3 1-Core 108 2-Core 217 80% 140 Pts	4-Core 406 8-Core 518 59% 462 Pts	64-Core 519 32% 519 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 83.8% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% MSI(1462 3418) CLim: 1435 MHz, MLim: 2150 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.10.1 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	17.6% Very poor	Lighting 19.8 Reflection 23.1 Parallax 18.8 16% 20.6 fps	MRender 28.6 Gravity 20 Splatting 25.7 20% 24.8 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 17.6% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
SSDPR-CX400-256 256GB 3,217 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 65GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 143 118 98 70 87 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Read 459 Write 356 Mixed 351 SusWrite 118 72% 321 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 53.9 4K Mixed 32.1 116% 38.8 MB/s	DQ Read 270 DQ Write 313 DQ Mixed 219 185% 267 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 90%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29 203,744 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 773GB free Firmware: 16.01H16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 67 70 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	84.2% Excellent	Read 224 Write 230 Mixed 87.4 SusWrite 68.8 112% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 4.2 4K Mixed 1.4 267% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 84.2% Great: 69%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50 72,924 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 774GB free Firmware: 1AJ100E5 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 69 67 70 69 69 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 199 Write 190 Mixed 85.8 SusWrite 68.8 100% 136 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 3 4K Mixed 1.1 211% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 77%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown GR1333D364L9/2G Samsung M378B5273CH0-CK0 GR1333D364L9/4G 830B M2X4G64CB88B7N-DG 14GB 8 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	52.8% Above average	MC Read 19.1 MC Write 17.7 MC Mixed 15.7 50% 17.5 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 18.2 SC Mixed 17.7 49% 17.3 GB/s	Latency 59 68% 59 ns
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 52.8% Great: 60%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical B75M-PLUS Builds (Compare 741 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B75M-PLUS

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	169x
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	112x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples	69x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	62x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	57x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	38x

SSD
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	25x
TA1D0120A 120GBGalaxBench 61%, 4,895 samples	22x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	22x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	29x
M378B5773DH0-CH9 4x2GBSamsungBench 48%, 2,464 samples	21x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $335

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16