Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	37.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF (all builds)
Memory	28.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180615
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 29 '19 at 20:30
Run Duration	142 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84% Excellent	Memory 95.5 1-Core 82 2-Core 203 73% 127 Pts	4-Core 390 8-Core 665 64% 528 Pts	64-Core 849 52% 849 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 84% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 19.3.3 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	37.4% Below average	Lighting 48.6 Reflection 32.4 Parallax 65.1 40% 48.7 fps	MRender 30.7 Gravity 49.9 Splatting 40.2 33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Plextor M6e PCIe M.2 128GB-$190 585 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 11GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.06 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 584 Write 331 Mixed 324 91% 413 MB/s	4K Read 30 4K Write 77.6 4K Mixed 33.1 129% 46.9 MB/s	DQ Read 380 DQ Write 333 DQ Mixed 240 212% 317 MB/s
Poor: 82% Great: 116%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$125 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 75GB free Firmware: EXM01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 461 459 460 459 463 461 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	110% Outstanding	Read 486 Write 456 Mixed 395 SusWrite 460 101% 449 MB/s	4K Read 31.2 4K Write 90.9 4K Mixed 43.3 151% 55.1 MB/s	DQ Read 382 DQ Write 330 DQ Mixed 346 262% 353 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 110% Great: 124%
WD Black 3TB (2013)-$151 16,992 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 15GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 106 105 105 106 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	60.2% Good	Read 104 Write 95 Mixed 66.5 SusWrite 105 68% 92.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 1 203% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 60.2% Great: 100%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS16G4D32AESE.M16F 2x16GB 18 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 2 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (32^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	79.9% Very good	MC Read 37 MC Write 21.5 MC Mixed 28.4 83% 29 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 20 SC Mixed 22 55% 19.3 GB/s	Latency 55.5 72% 55.5 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.9% Great: 91%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-UD4P-CF Builds (Compare 215 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 44%

Speed boat

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 40%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-UD4P-CF

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	56x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	43x
Core i7-5960XIntel $285Bench 80%, 15,468 samples	29x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	22x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	17x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	16x

SSD
CS900 500GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 16,267 samples	15x
NVMe LITEON 512GBCx2-8b512-q11Bench 181%, 1,201 samples	7x
M.2 PCIe SSD 512GBSpccBench 203%, 29,096 samples	7x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 2800 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 182 samples	10x
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 4x8GBHyperX $165Bench 81%, 6,271 samples	8x
M393A2G40EB1-CRC 4x16GBSamsungBench 98%, 194 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $330

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16