Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 71%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics87.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive64.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF X299 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 02 '19 at 23:12
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU 13%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216
CPU0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Memory 74.3
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 865
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,132
70% 1,132 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.15
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 118
Parallax 104
89% 110 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 102
Splatting 104
83% 101 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 88%
AMD HD 5770
PwrHis(1787 2288) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
11.6% Very poor
Lighting 15.3
Reflection 11.2
Parallax 13
12% 13.2 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 12.8
10% 11.9 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 530 Series 240GB-$149
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 117 166 125 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
64.2% Good
Read 364
Write 164
Mixed 225
SusWrite 127
49% 220 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 30.2
111% 42.3 MB/s
DQ Read 185
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 18.1
56% 122 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
76GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 166 165 166 166 166 167 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.9% Excellent
Read 130
Write 128
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 166
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
129% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 149 149 149 150 154 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 73.5
Write 121
Mixed 68
SusWrite 150
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.5
205% 2.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 90%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
44.8% Average
MC Read 13.6
MC Write 22.4
MC Mixed 12.7
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 91.8
44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF X299 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,648 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $777
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback