PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 55.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus TUF Z370-PRO GAMING (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180914 |
Uptime | 6.9 Days |
Run Date | Nov 03 '19 at 15:43 |
Run Duration | 261 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 11% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
82.6%
Excellent
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 436.30
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
43GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 221 271 287 282 293 280 MB/s
|
||||
Sandisk PLUS 1000GB
21GB free
Firmware: UH5100RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 97 57 4 28 3 MB/s
|
38.1%
Below average
|
|||
20.1%
Poor
|
||||
Hitachi Travelstar 5K750 750GB-$52
10GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 15 18 19 21 MB/s
|
29.4%
Poor
|
|||
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
4GB free
Firmware: 0104
SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 14 15 19 19 21 MB/s
|
8.02%
Terrible
|
|||
WD Blue SSHD 4TB (2015)-$65
14GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 67 71 71 70 68 MB/s
|
36.4%
Below average
|
|||
28.7%
Poor
|
||||
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 97 91 94 87 88 MB/s
|
57.5%
Above average
|
|||
WDC WD40 EZRX-00SPEB0 4TB
0GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
Samsung SSD 860 QVO 1TB
6GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
80.4%
Excellent
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-8700KIntel $198Bench 88%, 746,287 samples | 667x |
Core i5-8600KIntel $198Bench 91%, 264,837 samples | 300x |
Core i7-8700Intel $193Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 196x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 145x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 142x |
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 131x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 73% - Very good | Total price: $721 |