Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics120% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190307
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 07 '19 at 14:44
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 2600-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Memory 88.1
1-Core 111
2-Core 221
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 682
69% 560 Pts
64-Core 888
55% 888 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
Gainward(10B0 1E87) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.12
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
120% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 172
Parallax 183
128% 171 fps
MRender 181
Gravity 148
Splatting 114
117% 148 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$170
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,516
Write 1,970
Mixed 1,296
426% 1,927 MB/s
4K Read 51.9
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 70.3
233% 81.4 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 610
DQ Mixed 788
573% 748 MB/s
Poor: 195% Great: 393%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
91GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 6,687
Write 5,458
Mixed 5,891
1,339% 6012 MB/s
4K Read 379
4K Write 238
4K Mixed 276
1,054% 298 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 907
693% 947 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 129%
Adata SU650 240GB-$70
21GB free
Firmware: V8X01c55
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 434
Write 387
Mixed 345
87% 389 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 86.6
4K Mixed 30.6
124% 47.5 MB/s
DQ Read 110
DQ Write 240
DQ Mixed 181
136% 177 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 99%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID 0900
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 118 132 132 132 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 140
Write 143
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 128
140% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.5
39% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 52%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
112% Outstanding
MC Read 45
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 36.1
117% 40.9 GB/s
SC Read 26.3
SC Write 41.9
SC Mixed 31.3
95% 33.2 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,033 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 103% - Outstanding Total price: $322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback