Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 11% Tree trunk	Desktop 61% Destroyer	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	4.52% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus X99-A/USB 3.1 (all builds)
Memory	23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180419
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Nov 09 '19 at 10:39
Run Duration	321 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel @ 2.40GHz 172 User benchmarks, average bench 69% SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	69.3% Good	Memory 79.2 1-Core 85 2-Core 156 63% 107 Pts	4-Core 320 8-Core 592 54% 456 Pts	64-Core 1,249 77% 1,249 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 69.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710 187,161 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Asus(1043 85F7) 1GB CLim: 1081 MHz, MLim: 1265 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 388.13 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	4.52% Terrible	Lighting 5.33 Reflection 5.08 Parallax 5.38 4% 5.26 fps	MRender 6.05 Gravity 4.37 Splatting 6.96 5% 5.79 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.52% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,240 Write 1445 Mixed 1,208 360% 1,631 MB/s	4K Read 49.2 4K Write 86.1 4K Mixed 56.7 193% 64 MB/s	DQ Read 660 DQ Write 548 DQ Mixed 591 446% 600 MB/s
Poor: 199% Great: 340%
Crucial BX200 240GB-$36 36,559 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 0GB free Firmware: MU02.6 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 483 Write 423 Mixed 386 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 28.3 4K Write 64.6 4K Mixed 38 126% 43.6 MB/s	DQ Read 288 DQ Write 318 DQ Mixed 239 198% 282 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 91%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 614GB free Firmware: MZ6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 92 95 92 94 94 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	53.3% Above average	Read 92.7 Write 129 Mixed 29 SusWrite 92.7 62% 85.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.5 120% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 53.3% Great: 87%
WD Green 2TB (2012)-$49 170,877 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 133GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 88 89 89 89 89 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	52.7% Above average	Read 94.5 Write 85.2 Mixed 62.5 SusWrite 88.8 61% 82.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 189% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 52.7% Great: 84%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 85GB free Firmware: MZ6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 78 78 77 78 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	46.7% Average	Read 85.1 Write 69 Mixed 23.4 SusWrite 77.5 46% 63.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.6 128% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 46.7% Great: 87%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110 55,507 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 10GB free Firmware: 82.00A82 SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 0 9.2 27 26 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 46% Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 8TB (2017)-$87 42,465 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 1.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 125 124 124 127 130 MB/s Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	60.1% Good	Read 82.3 Write 97.3 Mixed 68.7 SusWrite 126 69% 93.5 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 0.5 210% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 60.1% Great: 90%
Toshiba E300 3TB-$116 1,216 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 813GB free Firmware: MZ6OACF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 108 110 110 111 110 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 112 Write 117 Mixed 41.5 SusWrite 109 69% 95 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 135% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 87%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$50 815,515 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 514GB free Firmware: CC24 SusWrite @10s intervals: 152 158 160 159 159 160 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	90.9% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 128 Mixed 80 SusWrite 158 96% 131 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 90.9% Great: 114%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB 31,793 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 256GB free, PID 25e2 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 58 59 58 59 58 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	28.2% Poor	Read 66.7 Write 57 Mixed 47.5 SusWrite 58.3 76% 57.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 96% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD 4x8GB 472 User benchmarks, average bench 84% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	117% Outstanding	MC Read 56 MC Write 39.9 MC Mixed 45.1 134% 47 GB/s	SC Read 12.5 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 17.2 43% 15.1 GB/s	Latency 82 49% 82 ns
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 116%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99-A/USB 3.1 Builds (Compare 1,288 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 65%

Destroyer

Desktop 81%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 57%

Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-A/USB 3.1

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	762x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	194x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	91x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	118x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	114x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	109x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	87x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	51x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	40x

RAM
4x8GBUnknownBench 70%, 41,916 samples	43x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	27x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 4x8GBCorsair $140Bench 87%, 4,858 samples	26x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 94% - Outstanding

Total price: $357

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16