Asus H170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 68%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics91.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus H170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory14.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160127
Uptime8.2 Days
Run DateNov 13 '19 at 02:09
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700K-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
75.3% Very good
Memory 84.1
1-Core 120
2-Core 228
81% 144 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 654
61% 506 Pts
64-Core 674
42% 674 Pts
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.8
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
91.2% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 126
Parallax 118
94% 120 fps
MRender 104
Gravity 115
Splatting 98.8
86% 106 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,668
Write 595
Mixed 459
197% 907 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 56.4
225% 88.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,157
DQ Write 1,016
DQ Mixed 866
710% 1,013 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
44GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 94 93 93 93 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
59% Above average
Read 112
Write 118
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 93
72% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1
210% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59%
Great: 112%
WD WD2003FZEX-00SRLA0 500GB
84GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 430 388 212 143 136 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 474
Write 418
Mixed 380
SusWrite 288
290% 390 MB/s
4K Read 43.3
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 59.2
10,443% 71.3 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 359
3,302% 362 MB/s
Poor: 28% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2400 C15 4x8GB-$182
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
68.2% Good
MC Read 24.8
MC Write 25.7
MC Mixed 22.4
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.7
SC Write 25.2
SC Mixed 19.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 73.3
55% 73.3 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 101%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 2,057 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170 PRO GAMING - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 76% - Very good Total price: $667
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback