PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 26.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 66.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock Z68 Pro3 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20110519 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Nov 16 '19 at 13:28 |
Run Duration | 127 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
60.9%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Gigabyte(1458 360B) 2GB
CLim: 1306 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30
|
26.9%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 229 140 138 128 129 131 MB/s
|
66.9%
Good
|
|||
Hitachi HCS5C1010CLA382 1TB
871GB free
Firmware: JC4OA3EA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 115 116 115 109 114 MB/s
|
43.4%
Average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Team Team-Elite-1333 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
39.1%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 171x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 64x |
Core i5-2500IntelBench 63%, 82,538 samples | 23x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 25x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 24x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 23x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 56% - Above average | Total price: $555 |