Asus STRIX H270F GAMING

Performance Results


Gaming 39% Jet ski	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	49.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus STRIX H270F GAMING (all builds)
Memory	8.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170927
Uptime	2.1 Days
Run Date	Nov 17 '19 at 02:34
Run Duration	219 Seconds
Run User	NZL-User
Background CPU	10%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700-$180 282,363 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	79.1% Very good	Memory 87.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 226 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 379 8-Core 642 62% 511 Pts	64-Core 645 40% 645 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 79.1% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Gigabyte(1458 3702) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.20 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	42% Average	Lighting 47.4 Reflection 54.9 Parallax 44.5 39% 48.9 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 47.5 Splatting 61.8 48% 59.1 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 650 120GB 2,684 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 36GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT01B0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 33 31 32 35 34 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	49.4% Average	Read 478 Write 282 Mixed 289 SusWrite 65.3 62% 278 MB/s	4K Read 32.3 4K Write 12.6 4K Mixed 11.9 71% 18.9 MB/s	DQ Read 179 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 94.9 79% 118 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 49.4% Great: 84%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 129GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 915 597 298 298 298 297 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	159% Outstanding	Read 1,146 Write 904 Mixed 538 SusWrite 450 169% 760 MB/s	4K Read 51.7 4K Write 96.2 4K Mixed 49.4 193% 65.8 MB/s	DQ Read 892 DQ Write 338 DQ Mixed 485 393% 572 MB/s
Poor: 142% ↑ This bench: 159% Great: 236%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$63 235,501 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 1.5TB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 188 191 192 190 191 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 162 Write 157 Mixed 74 SusWrite 189 106% 146 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 133% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 567GB free Firmware: JC4B SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 102 106 104 104 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	64.2% Good	Read 120 Write 114 Mixed 64 SusWrite 104 74% 100 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.8 143% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 68%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60 32,476 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AG01118 SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 102 105 105 106 105 MB/s Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	58.7% Above average	Read 99.5 Write 111 Mixed 51.5 SusWrite 105 67% 91.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 58.7% Great: 58%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 261GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 151 152 153 155 155 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	90.1% Outstanding	Read 161 Write 161 Mixed 107 SusWrite 153 107% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.1 231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 90.1% Great: 109%
WD Black 4TB (2016)-$174 9,888 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 1TB free Firmware: 81.H0A81 SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 98 104 97 99 101 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	64.7% Good	Read 126 Write 138 Mixed 73.5 SusWrite 98.7 80% 109 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 4.1 4K Mixed 0.6 184% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 64.7% Great: 113%
WD My Book 25EE 8TB 12,029 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 598GB free, PID 25ee Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 144 154 162 148 156 MB/s Performing as expected (58^th percentile)	70.6% Very good	Read 151 Write 162 Mixed 117 SusWrite 152 198% 146 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 70.6% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 2133 C15 4x4GB 1,898 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	73.8% Very good	MC Read 27.1 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 23 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 16.3 SC Write 27.2 SC Mixed 22.1 62% 21.9 GB/s	Latency 69.7 57% 69.7 ns
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 73.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical STRIX H270F GAMING Builds (Compare 1,797 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 53%

Yacht

Desktop 90%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 45%

Yacht

Motherboard: Asus STRIX H270F GAMING - $250

CPU
Core i7-7700KIntel $242Bench 84%, 712,312 samples	471x
Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples	421x
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples	189x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	202x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	193x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	151x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	74x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	69x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	52x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	69x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	62x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	46x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $751

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16