| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
| Graphics | 16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | ECS G41T-M9 (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20100309 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 19 '19 at 17:18 |
| Run Duration | 141 Seconds |
| Run User | ROU-User |
| Background CPU | 9% |
PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon L5410
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.35 GHz
|
46%
Average
|
38% 55.9 Pts
|
18% 131 Pts
|
8% 132 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
Gigabyte(1458 362E) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 441.20
|
16.1%
Very poor
|
16% 17.9 fps
|
16% 20 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC65
SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 33 7.5 8.7 10 7.3 MB/s
|
20%
Poor
|
25% 34.7 MB/s
|
21% 0.17 MB/s
| |
|
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$24
378GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 116 90 116 115 112 MB/s
|
64.9%
Good
|
75% 103 MB/s
|
166% 1.2 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
|
20.2%
Poor
|
18% 6.37 GB/s
|
18% 6.17 GB/s
|
39% 102 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical G41T-M9 Builds (Compare 5 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: ECS G41T-M9
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core2 Quad Q9300Intel $38Bench 46%, 10,428 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Duo E7500Intel $109Bench 39%, 39,897 samples | 1x |
| Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples | 1x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 79% - Very good | Total price: $38 |