| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 56.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit renk |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20111031 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 24 '19 at 19:00 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | TUR-User |
| Background CPU | 8% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
58.8%
Above average
|
52% 80.1 Pts
|
29% 236 Pts
|
17% 282 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 436.2
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
102%
Outstanding
|
94% 140 fps
|
119% 151 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 95 65 70 96 72 56 MB/s
|
56.4%
Above average
|
36% 161 MB/s
|
124% 44.4 MB/s
|
25% 61.8 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
229GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 187 194 190 192 194 198 MB/s
|
113%
Outstanding
|
116% 159 MB/s
|
142% 1.1 MB/s
| |
|
Seagate Expansion 2TB
436GB free
Firmware: 0706
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 29 29 MB/s
|
16.7%
Very poor
|
20% 26.8 MB/s
|
162% 1.37 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.9%
Below average
|
32% 11.4 GB/s
|
20% 6.93 GB/s
|
53% 74.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3 Builds (Compare 234 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus M4A89GTD-PRO/USB3
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Phenom II X6 1090TAMD $240Bench 57%, 23,506 samples | 48x |
| Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples | 40x |
| Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples | 31x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| Radeon HD 4290ATIBench 1%, 1,024 samples | 20x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 12x |
| HD 5770AMDBench 10%, 37,602 samples | 10x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 55% - Above average | Total price: $268 |