Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive40.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181107
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateNov 26 '19 at 17:06
Run Duration189 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
97% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 139
2-Core 273
94% 169 Pts
4-Core 527
8-Core 805
82% 666 Pts
64-Core 1,092
68% 1,092 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 97%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Zotac(19DA 1471) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2075 MHz, MLim: 2800 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.8
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.4% Very good
Lighting 73.6
Reflection 200
Parallax 200
60% 158 fps
MRender 127
Gravity 182
Splatting 125
117% 145 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 79.4%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
INTENSO 256GB
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM01.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 47 47 17 92 48 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 383
Write 354
Mixed 308
SusWrite 64.6
62% 278 MB/s
4K Read 31.8
4K Write 26.4
4K Mixed 1.1
64% 19.8 MB/s
DQ Read 179
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 17.5
34% 73.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 100%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
135GB free
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 397 273 272 273 272 273 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 434
Mixed 422
SusWrite 293
92% 412 MB/s
4K Read 42.6
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 49.1
171% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 217
202% 311 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 107%
Great: 118%
Intel Optane+7.2TBHDD
5TB free
Firmware: 16.8
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 166 166 168 173 173 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
636GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 70 70 69 70 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
45.2% Average
Read 88
Write 83
Mixed 51.7
SusWrite 69
54% 72.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
168% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 51%
TOSHIBA TransMemory 16GB
11GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 5.3 4.4 5.6 5.6 5.5 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Read 21
Write 3.3
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 4.9
9% 8.48 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3001 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
83.5% Excellent
MC Read 33.2
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24
83% 29.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 31.5
SC Mixed 27.1
75% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 53.6
75% 53.6 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,280 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $557
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback