Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV

Performance Results


Gaming 6% Tree trunk	Desktop 49% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.96% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	37.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV (all builds)
Motherboard	SAMSUNG NT270E5E-X2WR
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130701
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Nov 27 '19 at 07:31
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	93%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 2117U 5,157 User benchmarks, average bench 43% CPU Socket - U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	52.2% Above average	Memory 89.7 1-Core 28.2 2-Core 54.9 42% 57.6 Pts	4-Core 88.8 8-Core 94.4 12% 91.6 Pts	64-Core 81 5% 81 Pts
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 52.2% Great: 52%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 710M 2,241 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sanyo(144D C709) 1GB Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 21.21.13.6909 Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	3.96% Terrible	Lighting 4.77 Reflection 5.62 Parallax 0.94 4% 3.77 fps	MRender 4.38 Gravity 5.13 Splatting 5.35 4% 4.95 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.96% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Green 120GB (2016)-$84 21,990 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: Z3311000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 41 69 62 58 89 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Read 347 Write 17.3 Mixed 130 SusWrite 66.6 30% 140 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 34 4K Mixed 15.8 44% 17.9 MB/s	DQ Read 147 DQ Write 101 DQ Mixed 32.1 49% 93.5 MB/s
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 71%
Toshiba MQ01ABD100 1TB-$58 322,803 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 656GB free Firmware: AX002F SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 80 82 84 84 85 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	45.9% Average	Read 78 Write 85.3 Mixed 31.9 SusWrite 82 50% 69.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.6 112% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 45.9% Great: 62%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5273CH0-YK0 2x4GB 2,928 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (27^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 16.8 MC Mixed 16.6 46% 16.2 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 4 9% 3.1 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 42.4% Great: 57%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV Builds (Compare 124 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Samsung 300E5EV/300E4EV/270E5EV/270E4EV/2470EV

CPU
Core i3-3110MIntel $70Bench 48%, 34,445 samples	41x
Core i3-3120MIntel $100Bench 50%, 14,372 samples	22x
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	21x

GPU
HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)IntelBench 3%, 409,110 samples	75x
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	24x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	8x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	6x
SU650 120GBAdata $14Bench 63%, 42,288 samples	5x

RAM
SH564128FJ8NWRNSQR 1x4GBSmartBench 24%, 2,696 samples	14x
M471B5273CH0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 26%, 3,608 samples	13x
SH564128FJ8NZRNSDR 1x4GBSmartBench 27%, 754 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 56% - Above average

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16