MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 140%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 154%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 95.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics144% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive313% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C35
MotherboardMSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35)  (all builds)
Memory19.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191106
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 30 '19 at 07:55
Run Duration304 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
95.9% Outstanding
Memory 82.5
1-Core 148
2-Core 291
94% 174 Pts
4-Core 586
8-Core 1,054
99% 820 Pts
64-Core 2,030
126% 2,030 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gigabyte(1458 37B9) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 441.41
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
144% Outstanding
Lighting 197
Reflection 201
Parallax 208
161% 202 fps
MRender 224
Gravity 195
Splatting 130
144% 183 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 144%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1076 837 828 835 826 821 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,702
Write 2,518
Mixed 1,817
SusWrite 870
442% 1,977 MB/s
4K Read 68.7
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 96.8
326% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,250
DQ Write 1,021
DQ Mixed 965
769% 1,079 MB/s
Poor: 178%
This bench: 313%
Great: 355%
SanDisk Ultra II 960GB-$226
170GB free
Firmware: X41320RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 300 300 300 294 291 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 470
Write 383
Mixed 224
SusWrite 303
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 42.7
4K Mixed 29.1
98% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 192
147% 199 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 107%
SanDisk Extreme Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB (2018)-$189
460GB free
Firmware: 101140RL Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1890 1397 1402 1403 1401 1406 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
297% Outstanding
Read 1,905
Write 2,264
Mixed 1,791
SusWrite 1,483
420% 1,861 MB/s
4K Read 48.1
4K Write 165
4K Mixed 72.5
253% 95.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,298
DQ Write 1,060
DQ Mixed 1,174
881% 1,178 MB/s
Poor: 191%
This bench: 297%
Great: 337%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
207GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 9,759
Write 6,488
Mixed 7,712
1,772% 7,986 MB/s
4K Read 640
4K Write 458
4K Mixed 487
1,836% 528 MB/s
DQ Read 1,735
DQ Write 1,343
DQ Mixed 1455
1,111% 1511 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 134%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
666GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 190 190 189 189 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 170
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 188
105% 146 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 1.9
356% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 40.4
MC Write 34.8
MC Mixed 37.5
107% 37.6 GB/s
SC Read 23
SC Write 23.1
SC Mixed 31.4
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 76
53% 76 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 101%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) Builds (Compare 2,113 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 164%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 187%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MEG X570 ACE (MS-7C35) - $358

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 80% - Excellent Total price: $1,485
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback