Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 16% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	28.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (53%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3 (all builds)
Memory	9 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100810
Uptime	7.5 Days
Run Date	Dec 03 '19 at 19:48
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	53%

PC Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 860-$339 51,451 User benchmarks, average bench 64% Socket 1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	74.7% Very good	Memory 96.8 1-Core 90.5 2-Core 180 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 304 8-Core 322 41% 313 Pts	64-Core 328 20% 328 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 74.7% Great: 72%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670-$435 47,610 User benchmarks, average bench 28% Asus(1043 841B) 2GB CLim: 1267 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 436.30 Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	28.9% Poor	Lighting 33.3 Reflection 33.7 Parallax 42.6 27% 36.5 fps	MRender 46.8 Gravity 39.4 Splatting 34.4 32% 40.2 fps
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 28.9% Great: 31%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 750 EVO 120GB-$35 20,420 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 8GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT01B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 244 Write 238 Mixed 197 50% 226 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 65.7 4K Mixed 30.8 124% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 204 DQ Write 193 DQ Mixed 198 149% 198 MB/s
Poor: 65% Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70 337,642 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 400GB free Firmware: CC38 SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 97 99 97 97 97 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	33.8% Below average	Read 23 Write 57 Mixed 35.2 SusWrite 94.7 38% 52.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.8% Great: 68%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 471GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 103 105 107 107 106 MB/s Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	58.8% Above average	Read 103 Write 95 Mixed 86.7 SusWrite 101 72% 96.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.6 127% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 58.8% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 12GB 85,415 User benchmarks, average bench 35% null MHz 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048 MB Performing above expectations (85^th percentile)	43.4% Average	MC Read 15.3 MC Write 13.6 MC Mixed 12.3 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 13.8 GB/s	Latency 51.2 78% 51.2 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 43.4% Great: 50%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-P55A-UD3 Builds (Compare 515 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 22%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 17%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-P55A-UD3

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	139x
Core i5-750Intel $72Bench 62%, 43,796 samples	128x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	86x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	31x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	26x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	23x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	16x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	16x

RAM
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	110x
4x2GBUnknownBench 25%, 183,252 samples	95x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	78x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16