Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2.5GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 2.5GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite A135 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA IAKAA
Memory	0.9 GB free of 2.5 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colores, ,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20061208
Uptime	1.3 Days
Run Date	Dec 08 '19 at 20:31
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 T5200 307 User benchmarks, average bench 29% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	25.5% Poor	Memory 48.7 1-Core 11.5 2-Core 15.8 21% 25.3 Pts	4-Core 16.1 8-Core 16.2 2% 16.2 Pts	64-Core 16 1% 16 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 25.5% Great: 34%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fujitsu MHV2080BH 80GB 381 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 35GB free (System drive) Firmware: 00000028 SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 4.8 4.4 4.7 5.2 5.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	7.49% Terrible	Read 21 Write 26.8 Mixed 20 SusWrite 4.9 14% 18.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.1 37% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.49% Great: 20%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2GB 9,823 User benchmarks, average bench 15% null MHz 512, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	8.29% Terrible	MC Read 2.7 MC Write 2.1 MC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.37 GB/s	SC Read 2.7 SC Write 2.2 SC Mixed 2.3 7% 2.4 GB/s	Latency 166 24% 166 ns
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 8.29% Great: 27%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16