Acer Veriton M275

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics0.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemAcer Veriton M275  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Veriton M275
Memory2 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110718
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 22 '19 at 12:17
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
40.8% Average
Memory 67.6
1-Core 42.5
2-Core 83.6
42% 64.6 Pts
4-Core 84
8-Core 82.6
11% 83.3 Pts
64-Core 84.7
5% 84.7 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 40.8%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G41 Express Chipset
Acer(1025 0405) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.53% Terrible
Lighting 0.67
Reflection 0.54
Parallax 0.59
0% 0.6 fps
MRender 0.48
Gravity 0.47
Splatting 0.83
0% 0.59 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.53%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate ST340014AS 40GB-$50
3GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 40 22 37 35 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
24.7% Poor
Read 51.8
Write 52
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 34.2
32% 43.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 32%
Samsung HD080HJ 80GB-$25
10GB free
Firmware: WT100-33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 39 39 39 39 38 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
25% Poor
Read 48
Write 54.8
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 38.8
34% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25%
Great: 32%
TOSHIBA USB FLASH DRIVE 8GB
6GB free, PID 6545
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4 4.2 4.8 4.8 4.8 4.6 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
3.05% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 10.3
Mixed 4.3
SusWrite 4.5
10% 8.35 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.05%
Great: 6%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.9% Very poor
MC Read 5.5
MC Write 4.1
MC Mixed 3.8
13% 4.47 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 3.7
SC Mixed 4.8
12% 4.37 GB/s
Latency 107
37% 107 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 14.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Veriton M275 Builds (Compare 72 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 39%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Veriton M275

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $110
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback