Asus X99-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics37.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus X99-PRO  (all builds)
Memory25.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20151126
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateDec 23 '19 at 16:50
Run Duration212 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130
SOCKET 2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
80.5% Excellent
Memory 91.2
1-Core 102
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 377
8-Core 646
62% 511 Pts
64-Core 810
50% 810 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 80.5%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1800 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 361.75
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
37.3% Below average
Lighting 48.7
Reflection 46.7
Parallax 41.6
40% 45.7 fps
MRender 41.3
Gravity 42
Splatting 37.4
33% 40.3 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 37.3%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115
5GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9A
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 405
Write 210
Mixed 89.9
51% 235 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 56.7
4K Mixed 35.2
114% 39.2 MB/s
DQ Read 191
DQ Write 196
DQ Mixed 178
138% 188 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 114%
Transcend SSD370S 256GB-$115
67GB free
Firmware: 4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 254 265 198 262 258 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Read 392
Write 222
Mixed 264
SusWrite 244
63% 281 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 67.7
4K Mixed 29
110% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 212
DQ Write 222
DQ Mixed 152
132% 196 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 114%
WD Purple 2TB (2014)-$67
43GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 71 70 74 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 67.2
Write 80.3
Mixed 44.1
SusWrite 71.3
48% 65.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.8
156% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 86%
WD Purple 3TB (2014)-$81
17GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 53 64 58 69 71 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 73.3
Mixed 52.5
SusWrite 59.6
47% 63.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 85%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
17GB free
Firmware: 0A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 67 67 65 69 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 95.5
Write 80.8
Mixed 71
SusWrite 67.3
58% 78.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GB
4 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
MC Read 37.7
MC Write 35
MC Mixed 39.8
107% 37.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.9
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 18.9
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99-PRO Builds (Compare 371 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus X99-PRO - $320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $1,104
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback