Asus Z170I PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (94th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 6 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive113% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Z170I PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory3.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.5 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 29 '19 at 11:28
Run Duration232 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
Memory 90.6
1-Core 98.5
2-Core 202
76% 131 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 391
53% 395 Pts
64-Core 409
25% 409 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4860
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
5.56% Terrible
Lighting 5.77
Reflection 8.88
Parallax 5.56
5% 6.74 fps
MRender 8.38
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 12.2
7% 8.38 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.56%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SSD 120GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 356 115 146 141 117 134 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 475
Mixed 276
SusWrite 168
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 47.5
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 64.9
227% 82.7 MB/s
DQ Read 274
DQ Write 266
DQ Mixed 238
187% 259 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 113%
Great: 115%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92
232GB free
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1491 408 408 405 409 409 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
304% Outstanding
Read 2,538
Write 1,909
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 588
354% 1,595 MB/s
4K Read 42.9
4K Write 256
4K Mixed 102
331% 134 MB/s
DQ Read 1,003
DQ Write 1,821
DQ Mixed 1,156
950% 1,327 MB/s
Poor: 160%
This bench: 304%
Great: 280%
Seagate ST1000DM 010-2EP102 1TB
388GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 191 196 194 190 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 200
Write 79.3
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 193
102% 139 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 112%
Great: 114%
Seagate SkyHawk 1TB (2016)-$46
524GB free
Firmware: CV11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 151 148 151 150 151 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
91.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 167
Mixed 80.5
SusWrite 150
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
146% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 91.2%
Great: 98%
Philips USB Flash Drive 32GB
22GB free, PID 4200
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.6 4.9 5.7 5 5.5 4.9 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 28
Write 25.3
Mixed 24
SusWrite 5.7
27% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 5.2
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 1.6
111% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 10%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Apacer 78.BAGPD.AUC0B 78.BAGPD.C7Z0B 8GB
2460, 2460 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
79.6% Very good
MC Read 29.3
MC Write 31.9
MC Mixed 24.3
81% 28.5 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 23
65% 22.8 GB/s
Latency 66.4
60% 66.4 ns
Poor: 74%
This bench: 79.6%
Great: 80%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z170I PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,607 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170I PRO GAMING - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $620
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback