HP nc6xxxs

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP nc6xxxs  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 30D8
Memory0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 1 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20080110
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 04 '20 at 11:58
Run Duration236 Seconds
Run User ZAF-User
Background CPU 92%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Duo T5670
U10, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Memory 65
1-Core 9.2
2-Core 40.1
28% 38.1 Pts
4-Core 30.4
8-Core 26.5
4% 28.5 Pts
64-Core 35
2% 35 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 38%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 16 23 16 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Read 24.9
Write 36.5
Mixed 19.2
SusWrite 19
18% 24.9 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.2
33% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 2 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 2.8
MC Mixed 2.8
10% 3.37 GB/s
SC Read 2.2
SC Write 2.8
SC Mixed 0
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical nc6xxxs Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: HP nc6xxxs

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback