| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 18.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 25.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus P8B75-M (all builds) |
| Memory | 1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20140806 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Jan 15 '20 at 14:21 |
| Run Duration | 145 Seconds |
| Run User | SWE-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.5%
Very good
|
72% 122 Pts
|
42% 307 Pts
|
17% 270 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD HD 7850-$174
Sapphire(174B E221) 1GB
CLim: 860 MHz, MLim: 1200 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 19.12.3
|
18.8%
Very poor
|
18% 25.3 fps
|
20% 23.2 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
54GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 96 21 40 39 37 MB/s
|
25.5%
Poor
|
26% 116 MB/s
|
42% 16.3 MB/s
|
17% 25.9 MB/s
|
|
Kingston A400 120GB-$29
43GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 104 25 46 38 39 MB/s
|
33.2%
Below average
|
28% 128 MB/s
|
66% 21 MB/s
|
17% 22.6 MB/s
|
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
47.8%
Average
|
48% 16.6 GB/s
|
36% 12.7 GB/s
|
56% 70.9 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical P8B75-M Builds (Compare 1,496 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus P8B75-M - $470
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 387x |
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 205x |
| Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 131x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 103x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 97x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 87x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 67% - Good | Total price: $906 |