Lenovo 3227DB9

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 60% Destroyer	Workstation 3% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	2.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Lenovo 3227DB9 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO MAHOBAY
Memory	2.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20120807
Uptime	10.3 Days
Run Date	Jan 15 '20 at 20:08
Run Duration	161 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2400-$250 166,255 User benchmarks, average bench 61% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.1 GHz Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	70.8% Very good	Memory 88.5 1-Core 85.4 2-Core 168 68% 114 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 303 41% 306 Pts	64-Core 307 19% 307 Pts
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 8490 4,568 User benchmarks, average bench 2% HP(103C 90B8) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.2401.1001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.32% Terrible	Lighting 3.07 Reflection 3.15 Parallax 2.66 2% 2.96 fps	MRender 2.67 Gravity 2.1 Splatting 2.48 2% 2.41 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.32% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Seagate ST3250312AS 250GB-$32 19,180 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 7GB free (System drive) Firmware: JC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 20 12 16 19 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	16.6% Very poor	Read 40.3 Write 29 Mixed 36 SusWrite 17.5 23% 30.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.2 34% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 16.6% Great: 69%
Generic External 500GB 803 User benchmarks, average bench 30% 4GB free, PID 3920 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 39 57 59 48 46 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	18.6% Very poor	Read 39 Write 40.5 Mixed 26 SusWrite 49 53% 38.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 46% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 18.6% Great: 79%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 32GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 8.5 8.6 9.3 8.6 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	19.1% Very poor	Read 101 Write 12.3 Mixed 7 SusWrite 8.9 28% 32.4 MB/s	4K Read 5.2 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 2 101% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 19.1% Great: 32%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 32GB-$9 66,405 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 2GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.8 5.3 7.7 8.1 8.6 7.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	7.22% Terrible	Read 24.7 Write 5.8 Mixed 17 SusWrite 7.7 16% 13.8 MB/s	4K Read 5.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 1.2 69% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.22% Great: 28%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-H9 859B CT51264BA1339.M16F 8GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	49.6% Average	MC Read 16.9 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.2 49% 17.1 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 15.3 41% 14.3 GB/s	Latency 69 58% 69 ns
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 49.6% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Lenovo 3227DB9

Performance Results

PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)