Asus M5A78L-M/USB3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics53.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
MotherboardAsus M5A78L-M/USB3  (all builds)
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 17 '20 at 14:27
Run Duration190 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
AM3R2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
68.9% Good
Memory 87.2
1-Core 74.4
2-Core 143
62% 101 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 406
42% 340 Pts
64-Core 414
26% 414 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
53.5% Above average
Lighting 67.5
Reflection 68
Parallax 60.6
55% 65.4 fps
MRender 72
Gravity 62.1
Splatting 54.4
50% 62.8 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190
131GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXM06B0Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,448
Write 2,728
Mixed 2,691
657% 2,956 MB/s
4K Read 208
4K Write 86.3
4K Mixed 55.9
432% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 126
DQ Write 360
DQ Mixed 389
255% 292 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 116%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
606GB free
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 203 203 204 200 202 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.2% Above average
Read 220
Write 198
Mixed 183
SusWrite 202
45% 201 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 50.5
4K Mixed 32.9
108% 36.4 MB/s
DQ Read 29.5
DQ Write 69.8
DQ Mixed 39.6
33% 46.3 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 121%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
439GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 47 47 46 52 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 77.7
Write 78.3
Mixed 58
SusWrite 46.8
48% 65.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
128% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 54%
Seagate Desktop SSHD 1TB-$68
930GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 46 47 47 46 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
37.6% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 116
Mixed 57.2
SusWrite 46.8
56% 75.8 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 2.9
483% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 37.6%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
45.2% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.3
MC Mixed 15.4
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 10.2
SC Write 8.6
SC Mixed 13
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 70.3
57% 70.3 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 45.2%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A78L-M/USB3 Builds (Compare 1,855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M5A78L-M/USB3 - $53

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback