Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results


Gaming 34% Sail boat	Desktop 93% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 34% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	30.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	78.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (all builds)
Memory	8.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190929
Uptime	3.9 Days
Run Date	Jan 19 '20 at 07:13
Run Duration	202 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	13%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	91.1% Outstanding	Memory 75.8 1-Core 149 2-Core 295 92% 173 Pts	4-Core 570 8-Core 972 94% 772 Pts	64-Core 1,369 85% 1,369 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 91.1% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% EVGA(3842 6251) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.87 Performing way above expectations (85^th percentile)	30.8% Below average	Lighting 38.3 Reflection 30.4 Parallax 36.6 31% 35.1 fps	MRender 37.7 Gravity 37.3 Splatting 35.2 30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 30.8% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 218GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 277 260 277 290 279 280 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Read 422 Write 295 Mixed 239 SusWrite 277 69% 308 MB/s	4K Read 30.5 4K Write 88.8 4K Mixed 26.1 127% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 138 DQ Write 180 DQ Mixed 125 104% 148 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 159GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 370 270 288 300 287 284 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Read 484 Write 429 Mixed 390 SusWrite 300 90% 401 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 90 4K Mixed 55 174% 60.6 MB/s	DQ Read 218 DQ Write 138 DQ Mixed 199 143% 185 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 124%
Crucial BX300 480GB-$70 2,932 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 158GB free Firmware: M2CR010 SusWrite @10s intervals: 366 327 380 406 387 378 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.4% Very good	Read 465 Write 395 Mixed 361 SusWrite 374 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 22.3 4K Write 44.6 4K Mixed 27.9 93% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 171 DQ Write 184 DQ Mixed 181 135% 179 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 78.4% Great: 121%
Sabrent Rocket NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$30 11,181 User benchmarks, average bench 152% 122GB free Firmware: ECFM12.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 274 285 296 275 277 MB/s Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	172% Outstanding	Read 1207 Write 979 Mixed 1,015 SusWrite 385 200% 897 MB/s	4K Read 32.8 4K Write 137 4K Mixed 60.6 200% 76.8 MB/s	DQ Read 701 DQ Write 990 DQ Mixed 718 579% 803 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 172% Great: 223%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 80GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 93 86 88 94 89 88 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	55.4% Above average	Read 103 Write 91 Mixed 66 SusWrite 89.7 64% 87.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 55.4% Great: 109%
WD WD10EADX-00TDHB0 1TB 12,976 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 357GB free Firmware: 77.04D77 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 67 71 66 66 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	40.7% Average	Read 74.5 Write 73.5 Mixed 49 SusWrite 67.3 49% 66.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 103% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 40.7% Great: 57%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G4D32AESBK.M8FE 2x8GB 15,011 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.9% Very good	MC Read 29.3 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 28.6 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 21.3 SC Write 17.9 SC Mixed 27.1 63% 22.1 GB/s	Latency 88.7 45% 88.7 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 113%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $193

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	1,305x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $156Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	867x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $201Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	833x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	568x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	514x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	402x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	339x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	270x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	265x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	242x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $63Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	141x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 93%, 89,024 samples	141x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 100% - Outstanding

Total price: $914

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16