Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics26.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110310
Uptime12.9 Days
Run DateJan 19 '20 at 14:30
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 22%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Memory 88.2
1-Core 91.7
2-Core 181
71% 120 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 295
41% 304 Pts
64-Core 288
18% 288 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
Asus(1043 847A) 2GB
CLim: 1228 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (65th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
26.3% Poor
Lighting 30.3
Reflection 28.7
Parallax 40.9
25% 33.3 fps
MRender 40.2
Gravity 38
Splatting 31.9
30% 36.7 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 213 223 224 228 231 229 MB/s
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68% Good
Read 234
Write 220
Mixed 208
SusWrite 224
50% 222 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 34.9
116% 39.5 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 194
146% 196 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 68%
Great: 124%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
31GB free
Firmware: RVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 207 75 74 73 72 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Read 476
Write 432
Mixed 392
SusWrite 154
81% 363 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 71.1
4K Mixed 39.1
129% 45.8 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 366
275% 367 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 121%
WD WD5000AAVS-00ZTB0 500GB
414GB free
Firmware: 05.04C05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 79 81 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
46.7% Average
Read 82.5
Write 79.3
Mixed 50.8
SusWrite 79.8
54% 73.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 0.8
160% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.4% Average
MC Read 16.3
MC Write 16.2
MC Mixed 15.5
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12.2
36% 12.6 GB/s
Latency 69.4
58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 46.4%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,490 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback