MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive108% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190910
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 24 '20 at 19:03
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
90.1% Outstanding
Memory 69.9
1-Core 151
2-Core 302
92% 174 Pts
4-Core 592
8-Core 870
91% 731 Pts
64-Core 1,094
68% 1,094 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 90.1%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132
Zotac(19DA 1445) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 441.66
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
79.2% Very good
Lighting 98.9
Reflection 109
Parallax 92.9
81% 100 fps
MRender 94.3
Gravity 93
Splatting 93.5
77% 93.6 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000MX500SSD4 1TB
339GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 422 426 429 419 395 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 428
Mixed 410
SusWrite 416
98% 438 MB/s
4K Read 36.5
4K Write 88.1
4K Mixed 53.3
170% 59.3 MB/s
DQ Read 218
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 185
143% 196 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 123%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
30GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 225 210 71 74 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
89.8% Excellent
Read 368
Write 372
Mixed 327
SusWrite 143
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 88.7
4K Mixed 55.2
182% 62 MB/s
DQ Read 248
DQ Write 181
DQ Mixed 98.7
105% 176 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.8%
Great: 134%
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
32GB free
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 166 131 131 131 132 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Read 374
Write 329
Mixed 318
SusWrite 148
66% 292 MB/s
4K Read 42.2
4K Write 83.8
4K Mixed 48.7
171% 58.2 MB/s
DQ Read 239
DQ Write 199
DQ Mixed 71.3
94% 170 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 108%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$52
213GB free
Firmware: CC54
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 93 92 92 92 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
51.5% Above average
Read 87.7
Write 70.8
Mixed 66.7
SusWrite 91.5
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 96%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 76 75 77 80 80 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
42.2% Average
Read 69.2
Write 86.2
Mixed 50.7
SusWrite 77.8
52% 71 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
109% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
68.9% Good
MC Read 28.7
MC Write 18.1
MC Mixed 27.4
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 26.4
61% 21.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $160

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $905
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback