Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive	55% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME (all builds)
Memory	12.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130315
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jan 03 '17 at 11:14
Run Duration	411 Seconds
Run User	BEL-User
Background CPU	4%

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175 165,979 User benchmarks, average bench 72% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	88.8% Excellent	Memory 98.6 1-Core 116 2-Core 220 84% 145 Pts	4-Core 434 8-Core 581 64% 507 Pts	64-Core 581 36% 581 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 88.8% Great: 83%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170 123,956 User benchmarks, average bench 20% Gainward(10B0 11C0) 2GB CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 376.33 Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 18% Great: 21%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 250GB-$251 41,998 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 151GB free Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4314 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4050 (B1) Unknown 98 98 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 58 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 132 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7307195462	67.1% Good	Read 501 Write 240 Mixed 248 72% 330 MB/s	4K Read 22.7 4K Write 54.5 4K Mixed 11.9 78% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 229 DQ Write 210 DQ Mixed 32.7 76% 157 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 67.1% Great: 85%
Samsung 840 120GB-$109 51,792 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 32GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXT0AB0Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 4318 (0C) Power cycle count 95 95 4049 (B1) Unknown 82 82 172 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 70 57 30 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 141 (F1) Unknown 99 99 33478471103	55% Above average	Read 504 Write 117 Mixed 171 57% 264 MB/s	4K Read 22.4 4K Write 54.8 4K Mixed 9.18 75% 28.8 MB/s	DQ Read 181 DQ Write 109 DQ Mixed 27.2 52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 55% Great: 73%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 705GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 161 6758 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8933 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 9999 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6608 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 279 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 171 171 87846 (C2) HDA temperature 124 109 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	23.8% Poor	Read 36.2 Write 46.5 Mixed 51.9 34% 44.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.29 4K Write 1.46 4K Mixed 0.14 54% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 23.8% Great: 63%
WD WD3000GLFS-01F8U0 300GB 3,689 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 141GB free Firmware: 03.03V01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 199 198 3016 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9588 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 82 82 13850 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 91 91 9533 (C0) Power-off retract count 199 199 792 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9590 (C2) HDA temperature 122 105 25 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 2 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	54.1% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 94.7 Mixed 85.2 68% 91 MB/s	4K Read 0.94 4K Write 2.59 4K Mixed 0.5 142% 1.34 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 54.1% Great: 68%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170 41,439 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 84GB free Firmware: 51.0AB51 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 167 162 6633 (04) Start/Stop count 92 92 8401 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 87 87 10002 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6609 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 310 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 159 159 125075 (C2) HDA temperature 120 105 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	47.6% Average	Read 86.2 Write 79.5 Mixed 72.4 60% 79.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.34 4K Write 1.74 4K Mixed 0.13 60% 0.74 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 63%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 51GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 164 162 6766 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10498 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 12149 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8463 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 418 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10498 (C2) HDA temperature 119 106 31 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	28.2% Poor	Read 49.3 Write 48.6 Mixed 42.8 35% 46.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.46 4K Write 1.65 4K Mixed 0.29 82% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 57%
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 5GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 381 (03) Spinup time 110 101 7500 (04) Start/Stop count 90 90 10349 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 84 84 11846 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 92 92 8253 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 336 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 10013 (C2) HDA temperature 121 106 26 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	29.1% Poor	Read 52.1 Write 48.8 Mixed 45.6 37% 48.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.59 4K Write 1.69 4K Mixed 0.33 93% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 57%
ST2000DL 003-9VT166 2TB 16 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 651GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	22.9% Poor	Read 31.5 Write 27.4 Mixed 29.7 38% 29.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 3.97 4K Mixed 0.49 154% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 22.9% Great: 23%
Seagate Expansion 1TB 2,465 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 284GB free, PID 2320 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	32.6% Below average	Read 78.3 Write 71.4 Mixed 71.6 94% 73.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.53 4K Write 1.79 4K Mixed 0.38 76% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.6% Great: 42%
Hitachi HTS545025B9A300 250GB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 43GB free, PID 102a Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	14.2% Very poor	Read 32.5 Write 27.5 Mixed 13.1 29% 24.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.42 4K Write 1.09 4K Mixed 0.32 50% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 14.2% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F3 DDR3 2666 C11 4x4GB 222 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	70.8% Very good	MC Read 28.9 MC Write 21 MC Mixed 20.9 67% 23.6 GB/s	SC Read 23.7 SC Write 21 SC Mixed 22.9 64% 22.5 GB/s	Latency 43.4 92% 43.4 ns
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 89%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS V EXTREME Builds (Compare 306 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 76%

Battleship

Desktop 80%

Battleship

Workstation 62%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS V EXTREME - $550

CPU
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	190x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	47x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	20x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	27x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	16x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	15x

SSD
870 EVO 1TBSamsung $89Bench 112%, 129,044 samples	13x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
850 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 110%, 154,399 samples	8x

RAM
HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GBKingstonBench 63%, 12,722 samples	10x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 74%, 7,519 samples	8x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples	8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 64% - Good

Total price: $1,214

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16