Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 20.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium N3700 11,299 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	20.1% Poor	Memory 25.7 1-Core 23.7 2-Core 46.8 19% 32.1 Pts	4-Core 84.5 8-Core 83.2 11% 83.8 Pts	64-Core 85.9 5% 85.9 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 20.1% Great: 32%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CV1-8B128-HP 128GB 447 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 1GB free (System drive) Firmware: V182 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 423 Write 109 Mixed 106 46% 213 MB/s	4K Read 15.5 4K Write 23.7 4K Mixed 23.2 66% 20.8 MB/s	DQ Read 212 DQ Write 165 DQ Mixed 119 108% 165 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 92%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 16GB-$7 60,636 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 8GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.2 6.9 6.5 7.2 6.6 6.8 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	5.26% Terrible	Read 19.1 Write 7.3 Mixed 10.8 SusWrite 7.2 13% 11.1 MB/s	4K Read 3.9 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.2 21% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 5.26% Great: 23%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 1x8GB 2,370 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	15.9% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 6.6 MC Mixed 5.1 17% 5.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.2 SC Write 4.3 SC Mixed 3.1 9% 3.2 GB/s	Latency 281 14% 281 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 36%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 26%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Pentium N3700IntelBench 26%, 11,299 samples	4x
Celeron N3060IntelBench 18%, 20,242 samples	2x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	6x

SSD
SD8SN8U-128G-1006 128GBSandiskBench 66%, 10,347 samples	3x
L8H-128V2G-HP 128GBLiteonBench 64%, 1,392 samples	1x
CV1-8B128-HP 128GBLiteonBench 73%, 447 samples	1x

RAM
HP687515-H66-MCN 1x4GBKingstonBench 22%, 4,009 samples	3x
M471B5173EB0-YK0 1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 50,921 samples	2x
16KTF1G64HZ-1G9P1 1x8GBMicronBench 25%, 2,370 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16