PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent. |
Graphics | 52.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 100% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock B360M Pro4 (all builds) |
Memory | 10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20180525 |
Uptime | 0.8 Days |
Run Date | Feb 16 '20 at 09:36 |
Run Duration | 136 Seconds |
Run User | IDN-User |
Background CPU | 14% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
|
92.4%
Outstanding
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
52.6%
Above average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 273 261 257 258 257 253 MB/s
|
100%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$79
3TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 169 176 166 163 35 MB/s
|
90.7%
Outstanding
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 16GB
10GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 4.5 4.3 4.2 4.8 4.7 MB/s
|
13.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown CMK8GX4M1A2400C16 029E CMK8GX4M1A2400C14 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
34.9%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples | 305x |
Core i7-8700Intel $200Bench 87%, 349,567 samples | 230x |
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 173x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 139x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 82x |
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 80x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 92% - Outstanding | Total price: $395 |