Novatech BB-63008F

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics34.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory18GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 18GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemNovatech BB-63008F  (all builds)
MotherboardGigabyte 970A-DS3P
Memory5.1 GB free of 18 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20141007
Uptime2 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '20 at 17:25
Run Duration161 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 51%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-6300-$57
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
47.2% Average
Memory 68.4
1-Core 57.3
2-Core 96.5
47% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 143
8-Core 218
22% 181 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
34.7% Below average
Lighting 44.5
Reflection 30.9
Parallax 41.9
36% 39.1 fps
MRender 37.9
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 36.7
32% 38.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 63 51 51 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
39.9% Below average
Read 84.8
Write 155
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 52.9
58% 80.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.8
4K Mixed 1.5
301% 2.47 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 39.9%
Great: 110%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 95 99 102 104 101 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 98.5
Write 117
Mixed 27.8
SusWrite 101
62% 86.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.5
437% 3.07 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 110%
WD WD1001FALS-00U9B0 1TB
436GB free
Firmware: 06.01D02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 96 98 102 104 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 64.1
Write 62.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 101
52% 70.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
164% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMV8GX3M1A160 Samsung M378B5173DB0- ST25664BA1339 Samsung M378B5173DB0- 18GB
800, 800, 667, 800 MHz
8192, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
24.1% Poor
MC Read 8.8
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 8.2
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 8
18% 6.23 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $275Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback