HP h8-1534

Performance Results


Gaming 46% Yacht	Desktop 70% Battle cruiser	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	72.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	36.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

4 years ago, 4 years ago.

System	HP h8-1534 (all builds)
Motherboard	Gigabyte 2AC8
Memory	26.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121203
Uptime	0.3 Days
Run Date	Feb 24 '20 at 01:40
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	22%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Memory 81.6 1-Core 72.5 2-Core 138 59% 97.4 Pts	4-Core 223 8-Core 382 37% 302 Pts	64-Core 411 26% 411 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% EVGA(3842 6286) CLim: 2025 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 442.19 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.3% Very good	Lighting 72.2 Reflection 139 Parallax 123 59% 111 fps	MRender 114 Gravity 140 Splatting 110 98% 121 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB 86,316 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 169GB free (System drive) Firmware: UF4500RL SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 55 92 83 64 12 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 372 Write 256 Mixed 255 SusWrite 62.9 52% 236 MB/s	4K Read 15.6 4K Write 11.1 4K Mixed 15.7 50% 14.1 MB/s	DQ Read 73.2 DQ Write 41.4 DQ Mixed 37.3 33% 50.6 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 56%
Sandisk S3512G 512GB 19,948 User benchmarks, average bench 97% 198GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 79 80 80 80 80 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.8% Above average	Read 183 Write 149 Mixed 155 SusWrite 76.5 32% 141 MB/s	4K Read 26.3 4K Write 46.4 4K Mixed 32.3 106% 35 MB/s	DQ Read 144 DQ Write 110 DQ Mixed 125 94% 127 MB/s
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 119%
Sandisk S31024G 1TB 10,952 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 123GB free Firmware: X6107000 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 308 343 355 372 391 MB/s Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	89.1% Excellent	Read 473 Write 440 Mixed 326 SusWrite 321 88% 390 MB/s	4K Read 31.5 4K Write 67.1 4K Mixed 38 132% 45.5 MB/s	DQ Read 226 DQ Write 208 DQ Mixed 201 155% 211 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 89.1% Great: 121%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189 695 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 6TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 210 211 204 213 205 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	109% Outstanding	Read 181 Write 215 Mixed 99.5 SusWrite 196 127% 173 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 1.3 289% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 109% Great: 124%
WD Gold 8TB (256MB Cache 2017)-$189 695 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 6.5TB free Firmware: 01.01H02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 210 208 209 207 211 MB/s Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	112% Outstanding	Read 195 Write 194 Mixed 86.2 SusWrite 196 122% 168 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.2 4K Mixed 1.3 287% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 124%
WD Green 5TB (2014)-$170 1,889 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 364GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 76 79 80 81 82 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	48% Average	Read 92 Write 98.7 Mixed 64.7 SusWrite 74.6 61% 82.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1 190% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 48% Great: 97%
CT500MX5 00SSD1 500GB 302GB free, PID 2336 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	28.7% Poor	Read 30.5 Write 30.5 Mixed 29.7 SusWrite 26.8 40% 29.4 MB/s	4K Read 2.5 4K Write 5.8 4K Mixed 5.3 387% 4.53 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 4x8GB 8,984 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	42.3% Average	MC Read 16 MC Write 14.2 MC Mixed 15.1 43% 15.1 GB/s	SC Read 8.4 SC Write 8.2 SC Mixed 11.5 27% 9.37 GB/s	Latency 77.7 52% 77.7 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 42.3% Great: 63%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical h8-1534 Builds (Compare 31 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP h8-1534

CPU
FX-6200 Six-CoreAMD $40Bench 58%, 5,908 samples	20x
FX-6350 Six-CoreAMD $100Bench 59%, 29,222 samples	7x
FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 7570AMDBench 5%, 12,360 samples	9x
GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples	3x
GeForce GT 610NvidiaBench 2%, 62,458 samples	2x

SSD
870 Evo 250GBSamsung $31Bench 101%, 14,082 samples	3x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	2x
870 EVO 500G 500GBSamsungBench 88%, 499 samples	2x

RAM
NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI Ramaxel RMR5030MM58E8F1600 NT4GC64B8HG0NF-DI 10GBNanyaBench 40%, 68 samples	6x
RMR5040MM58F9F1600 RMR5030ED58E8W1600 RMR5040MM58F9F1600 10GBRamaxelBench 38%, 22 samples	2x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-PB 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 10GBMicronBench 43%, 21 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 70% - Good

Total price: $71

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16