Packard imedia S3800

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 44% Speed boat	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	3.75% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Packard imedia S3800 (all builds)
Motherboard	Packard FIH57
Memory	5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20091223
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 22 '20 at 12:20
Run Duration	220 Seconds
Run User	ITA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3 530-$45 16,724 User benchmarks, average bench 46% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	47.1% Average	Memory 64 1-Core 70.4 2-Core 129 52% 87.8 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 181 24% 179 Pts	64-Core 183 11% 183 Pts
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 51%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 320 2,109 User benchmarks, average bench 3% Sapphire(174B 2150) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.01 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	3.75% Terrible	Lighting 4.8 Reflection 6.42 Parallax 1.94 4% 4.39 fps	MRender 6.29 Gravity 3.23 Splatting 3.52 3% 4.35 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.75% Great: 4%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Green 1TB (2009)-$65 103,919 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 29 26 27 27 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 13.7 Write 39.8 Mixed 27.5 SusWrite 29 20% 27.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.1 23% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 57%
Seagate M3 Portable 4TB 5,513 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 14GB free Firmware: 9300 SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	14.3% Very poor	Read 29.8 Write 29.7 Mixed 25.4 SusWrite 18.7 19% 25.9 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.8 192% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 65%
Seagate Expansion 3TB 2,934 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 109GB free Firmware: 0710 SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.7 9.9 10 10 10 11 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.6% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 30.1 Mixed 29.1 SusWrite 10.1 18% 24.6 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 0.4 138% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 11.6% Great: 62%
WD Elements 25A1 1.5TB 818 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 50GB free, PID 25a1 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 17 17 17 17 17 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	12.3% Very poor	Read 31.4 Write 27 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 16.7 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.3% Great: 47%
Samsung D3 Station 4TB 1,261 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 97GB free, PID 6125 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.8 9.7 9.7 9.7 9.6 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	11.3% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 26.2 Mixed 25.6 SusWrite 9.7 30% 23.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.8 77% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 11.3% Great: 68%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 3TB 780 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 78GB free, PID d000 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 9.7 9.6 9.6 9.6 9.7 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	12.5% Very poor	Read 32.6 Write 28.6 Mixed 27.9 SusWrite 9.7 32% 24.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.4 77% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12.5% Great: 61%
SAMSUNG HD501LJ 500GB 17 User benchmarks, average bench 16% 199GB free, PID b159 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.5 9.3 9.4 9.3 9.4 9.5 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 29.1 Write 17.9 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 9.4 26% 20.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 91% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Toshiba ACR256X64D3U1333C9 4x2GB 148 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	29.1% Poor	MC Read 9.7 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 13.4 30% 10.4 GB/s	SC Read 6.6 SC Write 5.7 SC Mixed 7 18% 6.43 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 29.1% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical imedia S3800 Builds (Compare 73 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 46%

Yacht

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Packard imedia S3800

CPU
Core i3 530Intel $45Bench 46%, 16,724 samples	47x
Core i5 650Intel $70Bench 46%, 42,063 samples	12x
Core i7 860Intel $339Bench 64%, 51,451 samples	6x

GPU
GeForce 315NvidiaBench 2%, 2,008 samples	8x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	7x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	6x

SSD
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	3x
S3 1T00 1TBSandiskBench 95%, 12,396 samples	2x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	2x

RAM
GU512303EP0202 2x2GBHitachiBench 30%, 135 samples	7x
JM1333KLU-2G 2x2GBTranscendBench 39%, 308 samples	4x
ACR256X64D3U1333C9 2x2GBToshibaBench 29%, 236 samples	4x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $45

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16