HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
4 years ago, 4 years ago.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory9.5 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 15 '20 at 21:21
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X5687
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
71% Very good
Memory 92.7
1-Core 90
2-Core 187
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 461
44% 364 Pts
64-Core 469
29% 469 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 71%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
MSI(1462 3171) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1418 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.6% Above average
Lighting 62.4
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 59.1
51% 62.7 fps
MRender 73
Gravity 60.2
Splatting 53.7
50% 62.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 231 237 233 236 236 236 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
58.3% Above average
Read 212
Write 229
Mixed 205
SusWrite 235
50% 220 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 29.2
94% 33.7 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 76.5
DQ Mixed 108
87% 125 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 58.3%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721010CLA632 1TB-$109
668GB free
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 130 130 131 132 131 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 123
Write 124
Mixed 65
SusWrite 130
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
91GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 22 17 18 16 17 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
12.3% Very poor
Read 31.2
Write 26.5
Mixed 28
SusWrite 17.8
34% 25.9 MB/s
4K Read 3.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.5
97% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.3%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:01 98 9965525-018.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-018.A00LF ID:01 98 9965525-018.A00LF 46GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50.2% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.1
MC Mixed 19.4
50% 17.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.3
SC Write 12.9
SC Mixed 12.4
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50.2%
Great: 50%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,316 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $258
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback