PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
Graphics | 111% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
Boot Drive | 90.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asrock X299 Professional Gaming i9 (all builds) |
Memory | 120.8 GB free of 128 GB @ 3.2 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191128 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Apr 20 '20 at 21:09 |
Run Duration | 320 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i9-10900X
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
|
84.4%
Excellent
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 442.92
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
111%
Outstanding
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
HP EX920 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
752GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVN163 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 351 339 375 372 375 MB/s
|
90.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
672GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 163 163 160 161 161 MB/s
|
69.1%
Good
|
|||
Plextor M8Se NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
414GB free
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 401 424 422 473 474 473 MB/s
|
103%
Outstanding
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$164
795GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 918 509 484 511 508 510 MB/s
|
||||
Pcie SSD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: ECFM22.4 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1763 1025 972 976 941 972 MB/s
|
133%
Outstanding
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
1TB free
Firmware: CC4C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 149 145 150 148 MB/s
|
93.8%
Outstanding
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 8x16GB
8 of 8 slots used
128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
|
108%
Outstanding
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i9-7900XIntel $400Bench 82%, 19,432 samples | 17x |
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples | 17x |
Core i7-7800XIntel $236Bench 78%, 22,334 samples | 14x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 20x |
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 9x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 6x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $1,219 |