Asrock X99 Extreme6

Performance Results


Gaming 38% Jet ski	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 35% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	69.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X99 Extreme6 (all builds)
Memory	23.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180406
Uptime	6.9 Days
Run Date	May 09 '20 at 12:36
Run Duration	216 Seconds
Run User	MOZ-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5820K-$130 101,694 User benchmarks, average bench 77% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Memory 89.7 1-Core 98.2 2-Core 172 72% 120 Pts	4-Core 356 8-Core 586 58% 471 Pts	64-Core 770 48% 770 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 88%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-$500 167,107 User benchmarks, average bench 59% EVGA(3842 2982) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1506 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 442.19 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.8% Below average	Lighting 39.8 Reflection 45.9 Parallax 37.3 32% 41 fps	MRender 79.6 Gravity 39.7 Splatting 67.9 51% 62.4 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 66%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Team T2535T480G 480GB 1,628 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q1115A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 56 3.1 218 3.3 2.2 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Read 461 Write 389 Mixed 368 SusWrite 115 74% 333 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 84.7 4K Mixed 22 115% 44.8 MB/s	DQ Read 135 DQ Write 316 DQ Mixed 34.1 81% 162 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 97%
WD Green 6TB (2014)-$223 4,204 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 87 85 83 77 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	46.6% Average	Read 79.7 Write 74.5 Mixed 59.5 SusWrite 82.3 55% 74 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.7 142% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 46.6% Great: 98%
WD Purple Surveillance 8TB (2017)-$225 256 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 5GB free Firmware: 80.H0A80 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 90 Write 96.2 Mixed 49.2 58% 78.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 1 150% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 100%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 4GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 31 26 32 36 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	14.7% Very poor	Read 18.7 Write 25.7 Mixed 16.2 SusWrite 32.3 17% 23.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.5 83% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 7GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 80 80 80 81 84 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	44.2% Average	Read 74 Write 78.7 Mixed 18.7 SusWrite 80 46% 62.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.4 91% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 44.2% Great: 88%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB 5,677 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 3GB free Firmware: MZ6OABB0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 31 39 35 27 31 22 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.6% Very poor	Read 23.2 Write 44.2 Mixed 22.7 SusWrite 30.9 22% 30.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.5 85% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 15.6% Great: 88%
Seagate ST3500312CS 500GB-$24 89,637 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 63GB free Firmware: SS16 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 77 77 72 67 72 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	37.4% Below average	Read 56.3 Write 60 Mixed 43.5 SusWrite 73.7 43% 58.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 128% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 37.4% Great: 60%
SanDisk Ultra 64GB 2,296 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 15GB free, PID 558a Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 12 11 12 12 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	31.8% Below average	Read 160 Write 19.5 Mixed 25 SusWrite 13.5 50% 54.5 MB/s	4K Read 7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 1.3 114% 3.2 MB/s
Poor: 7% ↑ This bench: 31.8% Great: 32%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FAD BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FBD BLE8G4D26AFEA.16FBD 32GB 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	108% Outstanding	MC Read 41.8 MC Write 42.7 MC Mixed 42 120% 42.2 GB/s	SC Read 14.1 SC Write 18.4 SC Mixed 19.7 50% 17.4 GB/s	Latency 67.6 59% 67.6 ns

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99 Extreme6 Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 67%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 60%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock X99 Extreme6

CPU
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	71x
Core i7-5930KIntel $70Bench 80%, 34,039 samples	15x
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	3x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	13x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	9x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	8x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $76Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	9x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
MZ7LM240HCGR-00003 240GBSamsungBench 83%, 91 samples	3x

RAM
HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 86%, 51,435 samples	6x
Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2400 C15 4x4GBG.SKILLBench 83%, 2,352 samples	5x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 73%, 66,222 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $339

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16