PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor. |
Graphics | 39.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 43.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw6600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A9Ch |
Memory | 5.4 GB free of 24.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120920 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | May 15 '20 at 17:41 |
Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
Run User | EGY-User |
Background CPU | 49% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E5405
XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
|
31.8%
Below average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD RX 470-$126
CLim: 1226 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.20
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
39.2%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial MX500 500GB-$46
436GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 116 120 121 122 124 MB/s
|
43.9%
Average
|
|||
Sandisk USB Ultra 8GB
3GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.1 7.5 7.5 6.9 7.6 7.6 MB/s
|
4.15%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 57GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048, 2048, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
8.87%
Terrible
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 442 samples | 19x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54501stBench 47%, 569 samples | 15x |
CPU: Intel Xeon E54301stBench 46%, 705 samples | 10x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 6x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 5x |
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 5x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 66% - Good | Total price: $139 |