| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 33.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit farver |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20181108 |
| Uptime | 12 Days |
| Run Date | May 27 '20 at 20:15 |
| Run Duration | 142 Seconds |
| Run User | DNK-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.5%
Good
|
70% 126 Pts
|
50% 374 Pts
|
25% 404 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 770-$279
Asus(1043 8465) 2GB
CLim: 1215 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.67
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
33.7%
Below average
|
33% 42.3 fps
|
36% 44.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 840 120GB-$109
8GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT09B0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 27 26 27 28 27 27 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
17% 76.5 MB/s
|
73% 23.7 MB/s
|
64% 127 MB/s
|
|
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
37GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 44 46 46 47 MB/s
|
32.3%
Below average
|
48% 65.4 MB/s
|
191% 1.27 MB/s
| |
|
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
259GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 46 45 46 46 46 MB/s
|
48.6%
Average
|
65% 88.7 MB/s
|
206% 1.5 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x4GB-$40
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
71.8%
Very good
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
60% 20.9 GB/s
|
40% 99.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 330 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock A320M-HDV R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 3 2200GAMD $104Bench 60%, 181,631 samples | 79x |
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $125Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 57x |
| Ryzen 3 1200AMD $100Bench 57%, 83,528 samples | 23x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 38x |
| RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)AMDBench 10%, 85,536 samples | 25x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 83% - Excellent | Total price: $191 |