Asus M52BC_M32BC

Performance Results


Gaming 47% Yacht	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 38% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	65.2% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	99.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago.

System	Asus M52BC_M32BC (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK M52BC_M32BC
Memory	27.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150812
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	May 30 '20 at 15:39
Run Duration	125 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 590 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD FX-8350-$130 313,196 User benchmarks, average bench 61% Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 86.7 1-Core 73.5 2-Core 146 62% 102 Pts	4-Core 281 8-Core 427 44% 354 Pts	64-Core 428 26% 428 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 68%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 590-$200 122,060 User benchmarks, average bench 57% XFX(1682 9587) CLim: 1660 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 20.5.1 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	65.2% Good	Lighting 82.4 Reflection 82.7 Parallax 114 67% 93.2 fps	MRender 78.5 Gravity 83.4 Splatting 66.8 62% 76.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 65.2% Great: 62%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 395GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 405 406 417 420 422 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	99.1% Outstanding	Read 481 Write 439 Mixed 416 SusWrite 414 98% 438 MB/s	4K Read 37.1 4K Write 69.3 4K Mixed 47.2 153% 51.2 MB/s	DQ Read 130 DQ Write 160 DQ Mixed 147 110% 145 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 99.1% Great: 133%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50 344,862 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 1.5TB free Firmware: MX4OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 177 177 178 171 176 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	91.8% Outstanding	Read 144 Write 142 Mixed 32 SusWrite 176 89% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.2 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 148% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 91.8% Great: 108%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 1866 CL10 Series 4x8GB 2,056 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz Performing below potential (25^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	48.1% Average	MC Read 19.4 MC Write 15.1 MC Mixed 17.2 49% 17.2 GB/s	SC Read 10.1 SC Write 8.7 SC Mixed 13.1 30% 10.6 GB/s	Latency 70.7 57% 70.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 48.1% Great: 77%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M52BC_M32BC Builds (Compare 58 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 56%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Asus M52BC_M32BC

CPU
FX-8310AMDBench 60%, 1,697 samples	31x
FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples	14x
FX-8300AMD $168Bench 58%, 49,767 samples	10x

GPU
R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples	14x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	6x
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples	4x

SSD
SSD Plus 120GBSanDisk $42Bench 58%, 87,912 samples	2x
SSD 500GBSeagateBench 90%, 1,930 samples	2x
Solid State Disk 1TBSpccBench 79%, 17,192 samples	2x

RAM
ASU16D3LU1KBGR/4G 4x4GBKingstonBench 42%, 103 samples	5x
M378B1G73DB0-CK0 1x8GBSamsungBench 30%, 12,268 samples	4x
ASU16D3LU1KFG/8G 1x8GBKingstonBench 30%, 651 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 8% - Terrible

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16