Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 79%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics97.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory10.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191125
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateJun 17 '20 at 05:14
Run Duration179 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$84
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Memory 79
1-Core 140
2-Core 279
90% 166 Pts
4-Core 481
8-Core 803
78% 642 Pts
64-Core 988
61% 988 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
MSI(1462 C304) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 445.87
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Lighting 126
Reflection 138
Parallax 128
103% 131 fps
MRender 97.2
Gravity 122
Splatting 104
88% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB-$81
47GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 250 175 136 133 125 127 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 492
Write 426
Mixed 279
SusWrite 158
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 37.5
4K Write 89
4K Mixed 46.9
164% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 225
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 197
151% 204 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 100%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
5GB free
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 501
Write 446
Mixed 447
104% 465 MB/s
4K Read 41
4K Write 95.5
4K Mixed 56
184% 64.2 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 189
DQ Mixed 205
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
75GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 60 60 61 61 61 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
40.7% Average
Read 81.3
Write 80.3
Mixed 78.2
SusWrite 60.2
56% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
143% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 83%
WD Black 1TB (2013)-$48
204GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 119 121 121 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 143
Write 117
Mixed 72.8
SusWrite 124
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.1
231% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 108%
WD Elements 2TB
2TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 104 107 105 104 105 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45% Average
Read 109
Write 77.5
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 105
116% 88.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.8
97% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 45%
Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2866 MHz
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
78.5% Very good
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 21.4
MC Mixed 31.1
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 22.5
SC Write 20
SC Mixed 28.5
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 82.4
49% 82.4 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,870 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $598
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback