Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	23.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (87%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP OMEN by HP Laptop 15-dc1xxx (all builds)
Motherboard	HP 8575
Memory	0.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1600 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200323
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Jul 01 '20 at 19:00
Run Duration	162 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	87%

PC Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9300H 116,682 User benchmarks, average bench 65% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	32.5% Below average	Memory 15.5 1-Core 78.3 2-Core 138 38% 77.1 Pts	4-Core 275 8-Core 322 39% 298 Pts	64-Core 458 28% 458 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 32.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Intel UHD Graphics 630 506,702 User benchmarks, average bench 5% HP(103C 8575) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7927 Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	5.55% Terrible	Lighting 6.17 Reflection 49.4 Parallax 4.06 5% 19.9 fps	MRender 4.33 Gravity 5.47 Splatting 12.3 7% 7.38 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 5.55% Great: 6%
Nvidia GTX 1650 (Mobile) 92,838 User benchmarks, average bench 41% HP(103C 8575) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 441.45 Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	23.2% Poor	Lighting 20.6 Reflection 52.2 Parallax 42.2 17% 38.3 fps	MRender 36.8 Gravity 45.6 Splatting 46.3 36% 42.9 fps
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 23.2% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteon CA3-8D128-HP 128GB 3,206 User benchmarks, average bench 107% 16GB free (System drive) Firmware: A381 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 557 Write 376 Mixed 321 92% 418 MB/s	4K Read 9.9 4K Write 20.1 4K Mixed 12.9 42% 14.3 MB/s	DQ Read 240 DQ Write 314 DQ Mixed 207 176% 254 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 137%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB 546,982 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 781GB free Firmware: JB0OA3T0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 113 90 103 92 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	35.2% Below average	Read 22.5 Write 19.4 Mixed 48 SusWrite 99.8 35% 47.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.6 113% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 35.2% Great: 75%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 1x8GB 38,499 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	24.8% Poor	MC Read 11.3 MC Write 7.9 MC Mixed 9.1 27% 9.43 GB/s	SC Read 5.4 SC Write 5.6 SC Mixed 6.3 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 355 11% 355 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.8% Great: 46%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 57%

Gunboat

Desktop 83%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 50%

Yacht

GPU
RTX 2060 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 71%, 119,687 samples	1,162x
GTX 1660-Ti (Mobile)NvidiaBench 65%, 82,746 samples	925x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples	452x

SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples	335x
MZVLB256HAHQ-000H1 256GBSamsungBench 174%, 20,171 samples	271x
TOSHIBA 256GBKxg60znv256gBench 173%, 3,049 samples	191x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 2x8GBSamsungBench 76%, 108,106 samples	670x
M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GBSamsungBench 40%, 96,646 samples	222x
HMA81GS6DJR8N-VK 2x8GBHynixBench 75%, 8,097 samples	172x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $33	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16