1aaaa TIGD-CI3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 12 years and 1 month old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
System1aaaa TIGD-CI3  (all builds)
Motherboard TIGD-CI3
Memory0.8 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120217
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 02 '20 at 18:02
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU 49%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Atom D525-$200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Memory 53
1-Core 10.5
2-Core 19
22% 27.5 Pts
4-Core 35.6
8-Core 35.7
5% 35.7 Pts
64-Core 36.4
2% 36.4 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 29%
Drive Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$35
123GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 113 113 108 110 113 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
60.3% Good
Read 100
Write 97.3
Mixed 61.5
SusWrite 110
68% 92.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
172% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya NT2GC64B88B0NS-CG 1x2GB
1 of 2 slots used
2GB DIMM DDR2 800 MHz
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
11.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.1
10% 3.57 GB/s
SC Read 1.7
SC Write 3
SC Mixed 2.7
7% 2.47 GB/s
Latency 150
27% 150 ns
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.2%
Great: 28%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
Intel Core i7-11700K $346Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $74SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $77SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback