Asus P5Q-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics48.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5Q-E  (all builds)
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20090406
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJul 05 '20 at 20:30
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 25%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
42.5% Average
Memory 66.5
1-Core 27.7
2-Core 55.5
35% 49.9 Pts
4-Core 109
8-Core 110
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 109
7% 109 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 42.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Nvidia(10DE 13C2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1392 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 432.00
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
48.6% Average
Lighting 59.5
Reflection 64.3
Parallax 57.7
48% 60.5 fps
MRender 71.5
Gravity 58.2
Splatting 52.1
49% 60.6 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 48.6%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 73 72 79 49 49 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
41.1% Average
Read 222
Write 200
Mixed 199
SusWrite 62.5
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 19.5
86% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 28.6
DQ Write 78.4
DQ Mixed 23.9
27% 43.6 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.1%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$39
210GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 90 88 92 92 91 91 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 101
Write 99.5
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 90.6
67% 90.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 74%
WD RE4 500GB (2010)-$30
64GB free
Firmware: 01.01S02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 76 80 80 49 50 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 72.7
Write 69.1
Mixed 60.1
SusWrite 65.1
50% 66.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.5% Very poor
MC Read 7
MC Write 4.6
MC Mixed 4.8
16% 5.47 GB/s
SC Read 5.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 5.3
14% 5.07 GB/s
Latency 110
36% 110 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5Q-E Builds (Compare 194 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5Q-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $189
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback