Asus Maximus Formula

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus Maximus Formula  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20090910
Uptime8.9 Days
Run DateJul 07 '20 at 16:45
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 6400
LGA775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
22% Poor
Memory 40.5
1-Core 14.1
2-Core 17.4
19% 24 Pts
4-Core 21.5
8-Core 25.3
3% 23.4 Pts
64-Core 29.1
2% 29.1 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 22%
Great: 41%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD740ADFD-00NLR1 74GB
55GB free
Firmware: 21.07QR5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 49 37 40 38 35 37 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 54.1
Write 54.9
Mixed 32.9
SusWrite 39.2
33% 45.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
148% 1 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 48%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P22OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 9.9 19 21 23 25 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
19.6% Very poor
Read 46.9
Write 54
Mixed 31.2
SusWrite 21.2
28% 38.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
120% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 19.6%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS721616PLA380 160GB-$46
149GB free
Firmware: P22OABEA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 39 42 41 38 39 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
24.6% Poor
Read 44.8
Write 53.4
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 40.6
31% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 24.6%
Great: 39%
Seagate ST3160815AS 160GB-$46
127GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 21 20 26 24 29 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
22.4% Poor
Read 55.2
Write 55.5
Mixed 32.2
SusWrite 22.5
30% 41.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
93% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 42%
WD WD2500YS-01SHB1 251GB
218GB free
Firmware: 20.06C06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 32 35 33 31 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 49.2
Write 46.6
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 33
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
116% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 35%
USB DISK 2.0 8GB
7GB free, PID 4300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.5 2.5 3.2 4 3.7 4 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
2.07% Terrible
Read 7.5
Write 1.2
Mixed 2.2
SusWrite 3.3
4% 3.55 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
4% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.07%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
10.5% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.2
MC Mixed 3.9
10% 3.67 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.2
SC Mixed 0.6
4% 1.57 GB/s
Latency 200
20% 200 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Maximus Formula Builds (Compare 52 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus Maximus Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $100
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback