PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 46.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus PRIME H310M-R R2.0 (all builds) |
Memory | 3.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20191011 |
Uptime | 1.3 Days |
Run Date | Jul 09 '20 at 19:32 |
Run Duration | 107 Seconds |
Run User | PRT-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
72.2%
Very good
|
||||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155
Nvidia(10DE 1320) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 451.67
|
46.9%
Average
|
|||
Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
SDM8SI240A 240GB
101GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0424A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 60 113 23 13 20 MB/s
|
27.1%
Poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
SM4U610CM0888DAFC 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
39.8%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 1,855x |
Core i3-9100FIntel $88Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 862x |
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 187x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 458x |
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples | 386x |
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $240Bench 71%, 428,800 samples | 355x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $285 |