| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 29.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1862 x 1036 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20140930 |
| Uptime | 5 Days |
| Run Date | Jul 10 '20 at 02:57 |
| Run Duration | 138 Seconds |
| Run User | CHL-User |
| Background CPU | 47% |
PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-2400 CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
|
52.9%
Above average
|
53% 91.1 Pts
|
32% 244 Pts
|
13% 215 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 446.14
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.5%
Poor
|
30% 33.1 fps
|
29% 35.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
32GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 149 143 149 194 155 MB/s
|
23.9%
Poor
|
23% 102 MB/s
|
33% 11.2 MB/s
|
9% 12.3 MB/s
|
|
Toshiba HDWD105 500GB-$49
98GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1OA8J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 16 16 25 22 45 MB/s
|
37.8%
Below average
|
48% 65.7 MB/s
|
106% 0.83 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston 99U5471-056.A00LF 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
|
18.9%
Very poor
|
18% 6.13 GB/s
|
15% 5.17 GB/s
|
36% 113 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-H61M-DS2 Builds (Compare 2,310 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-DS2 - $69
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 249x |
| Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 221x |
| Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples | 175x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| HD 2000 (Desktop 1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 150,891 samples | 310x |
| HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 291x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 133x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $156 |